2, 3, 9 & 10 (In Civil Review Petition No. 79 of 2002).ĪF Hasan Ariff Attorney-General, Fida M Kamal, Additional Attorney-General, Adilur Rahman, Deputy Attorney-General with him) instructed by Md Ataur Rahman Khan, Advocate-on-Record-For Respondent Nos. 80 of 2002).Ībdur Razzaq, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md Aftab Hossain. Syed Ishtiaq Ahmed, Senior Advocate, instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners (In Civil Review Petition No. Nawab Ali Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners (In Civil Review Petition No. Kamal Hossain, Senior Advocate, instructed by Md. Rafique-ul-Huq, Senior Advocate, M Moniruzzaman Khan, Advocate with him instructed by AKM Shahidul Huq, Advocate-on-Record-For the Petitioners (In Civil Review Petition No. In the impugned judgement there is no error apparent on the face of the record………………….(34 & 36) Where the rule of law comes in conflict with third party interest the rule of law, will, of course, prevail. In such a case benefit will be derived by a large number of people in contrast to a few, PIL considers the interest of others and therefore, in a public interest litigation the court will lean to protect the interest of the general public and the rule of law vis-à-vis the private interest. The nature of public interest litigation (called PIL hereinafter) is completely different from a traditional case which is adversarial in nature whereas PIL is intended to vindicate rights of the people. Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (V of 1908)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |